Early Criticism Of The iPad: Counter Points

Some people clearly get what the iPad is including;

Daring Fireball obviously

This recent editorial from Gizmodo (after a day of criticizing the device)

Stephen Fry

And linked from DF  Cruftbox

Generally though the technoblogosphere has been pretty harsh to Apple’s latest creation. So let’s breakdown the primary critiques;

  1. There’s no camera. I’d say a pretty small population actually uses video iChat, which is what we are really talking about. And I’d say that Apple knows this better than anyone. Other than that function, there’s no real reason to put a camera onboard either facing inward or outward. It would make a clumsy camera experience, with the big screen I guess you could argue it would make for an interesting video camera experience. But to really be a great video camera it’s going to need a lot of video camera tech that’s going to significantly increase thickness which is clearly not going to happen. So to me the camera is not really a deal breaker or a game changer for the device. It’s a one application piece of hardware.  UPDATE: Great piece in Ars Technica on this very issue. 
  2. Flash Support. Apple is clearly on a crusade against Flash, so anyone actually believing the device would support Flash was completely ignoring reality. It wasn’t going to EVER support Flash so it’s not a missing feature. Apple didn’t say that the iPad would support Flash, and then change its’ mind. If Apple was wavering at all, the HTML 5 trials by YouTube and Vimeo have only emboldened this crusade against all things Flash. Now, the iPhone has never supported Flash, and in 2.5 years of using every iteration of the iPhone I cannot once recall ever going, damn what I really need is Flash. There’s the occasional video that’s it. Now, on my Mac, Flash is heavy on a number of websites predominantly ESPN.com. However, I never go to espn.com on my iPhone. I have apps for that. BBC news, app for that. AP news, app for that. CNN, app for that. All of those information type services, which use Flash video and have all packaged their content into an application to create value for their specific service. Hulu might be the number one actually real example that makes sense in all the articles that I have read. However, that’s only because Hulu is currently free. Once Hulu goes to any kind of paid service, the folks touting it, will start trashing it. Hulu with a subscription plan or paid access, is basically iTunes for TV shows. Apple is already trying to negotiate TV show subscription access for Macs, iPhones, and now iPads.
  3. Some kind of multi-tasking. Let’s put this in a parking lot for now. I’ll get to this in an upcoming speculation article
  4. No Verizon, still only on ATT, I’ll get to this issue as well in the speculation article
  5. More of Apple’s closed eco system. Again, this is a matter of expectation. Did anyone really think that the app store was not going to be the delivery method for installing software to this device? Did Apple indicate something different? No, because they didn’t say anything. So at this point, the app store really isn’t an iPad criticism; it’s an overall Apple criticism. This for most folks is not an issue. It’s an issue for tech geeks, but for 98% of users not an issue. And if Apple has proved anything over the last 7 years, they are not making devices with features that only the tech elite wants. They are not making devices or OSes that you hack/modify/customize. Apple is all about a unified user experience.
  6. Storage space. Now this one is silly as well. The pundits cannot get themselves outside of a Windows laptop framework where you need 500 gigs because MS Office and the OS are massive. The iPad OS is small. iPad apps are small. Apple’s been selling gear with 16 GB for years and folks have adjusted to that size easily. You load movies/music/apps and Apple has an easy interface for you to manage this. If you have a massive music/video library and you always need that with you, then Apple has other products for you.
  7. No USB port. On the surface this is the most valid criticism, if it was a MacBook or a Windows NetBook. Again, it’s not either device. What do you use USB for? Connecting peripherals and storage. The iPad is designed to sync with a laptop to provide “backup” capability. It’s designed to be an easy to carry around solo device. You don’t connect devices to it. You don’t connect a scanner to it. Now Apple has provided a dongle attachment that gives a USB port (for digital cameras only right now). Clearly there is nothing stopping Apple from expanding the use of that USB dongle, or adding an usb port down the road once the iPad is no longer regularly synced with a computer (it’s become more of a stand alone device).
Advertisements
    • atlantasooner
    • January 30th, 2010

    Engadget has already started finding hidden features and code in the iPad iPhone 0S 3.2.
    Seems to verify the impression that not everything about the iPad OS was revealed on Wednesday.

    http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/29/confirmed-iphone-os-3-2-has-support-for-video-calling-file-dow/

  1. January 30th, 2010

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: